U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1987

MacArthur Hicks v. R. M. Muncy Attorney General of Virginia

MacArthur Hicks v. R. M. Muncy Attorney General of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1987
815 F.2d 74; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3781; 1987 WL 35949 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

MacArthur Hicks v. R. M. Muncy Attorney General of Virginia

Opinion

815 F.2d 74
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
MacArthur HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
R. M. MUNCY; Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 86-6835.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 18, 1987.
Decided March 26, 1987.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

MacArthur Hicks, appellant pro se.

Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. Muncy, C/A No. 86-23-B (W.D. Va., Dec. 3, 1986).

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.