Curtis E. Crawford v. Zell Williams, Hearing Officer
Curtis E. Crawford v. Zell Williams, Hearing Officer
Opinion
816 F.2d 671
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Curtis E. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Zell WILLIAMS, Hearing Officer, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-6508.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 1987.
Decided April 7, 1987.
Curtis E. Crawford, pro se.
Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Crawford v. Williams, C/A No. 85-4842-M (D.Md., Dec. 10, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
---------------
* We deny Crawford's "Motion for Assistant of Counsel".
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.