Brent v. Lyles
Brent v. Lyles
Opinion
823 F.2d 546
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles E. BRENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Howard LYLES, Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary; Arnold
Hopkins, Commissioner; Roe White, Officer; Brenda
Vogel, Education Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7097
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 20, 1987.
Decided July 7, 1987.
Charles E. Brent, appellant pro se.
Richard M. Kastendieck, Assistant Attorney General; Rex Charles Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before HALL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Brent v. Lyles, C/A No. 86-2830 (D. Md., Mar. 23, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.