U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1987

Peter Kinard, Jr. v. United States Postal Service Fred Crenshaw, Superintendent of Operation

Peter Kinard, Jr. v. United States Postal Service Fred Crenshaw, Superintendent of Operation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 1987
829 F.2d 35; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11351; 1987 WL 44685 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Peter Kinard, Jr. v. United States Postal Service Fred Crenshaw, Superintendent of Operation

Opinion

829 F.2d 35
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Peter KINARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; Fred Crenshaw, Superintendent
of Operation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-2032

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 31, 1987.
Decided August 25, 1987.

Peter Kinard, Jr., appellant pro se.

James D. McCoy, III, Office of the United States Attorney, William T. Alvis, Office of Postal Rates and Mailing Rules, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing the 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-16(c) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Kinard v. United States Postal Service, C/A No. 86-1195 (D.S.C., Feb. 11, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.