Moses v. Leeke
Moses v. Leeke
Opinion
833 F.2d 310
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George N. MOSES, Orlandor Smith, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
William D. LEEKE, Commissioner of the South Carolina
Department of Corrections, Travis Medlock, the
Attorney General of the state of South
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 87-7561.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 5, 1987.
Decided Oct. 29, 1987.
George N. Moses and Orlandor Smith, appellants pro se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moses v. Leeke, C/A Nos. 85-1304, 85-1271 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 1987).
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.