Glen Roy Kendall, A/K/A Amin Moori v. Peter Manny, Stephen D. Kaften, and C. Hoy Steele, Carlton B. Botte, A.J. Bottley, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 3, 1987

Glen Roy Kendall, A/K/A Amin Moori v. Peter Manny, Stephen D. Kaften, and C. Hoy Steele, Carlton B. Botte, A.J. Bottley, Jr., 835 F.2d 874 (4th Cir. 1987)

1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15755; 1987 WL 24507

Opinion

835 F.2d 874
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Glen Roy KENDALL, a/k/a Amin Moori, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Peter MANNY, Stephen D. Kaften, Defendants-Appellees,
and
C. Hoy STEELE, Carlton B. Botte, A.J. Bottley, Jr., Defendants.

No. 87-6077.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 29, 1987.
Decided Dec. 3, 1987.

(Glen Roy Kendall, appellant pro se.

Richard Alan Saunders, Furniss, Davis & Rashkind, Nancy Tordai O'Shaughnessy, Johnson, Cusack & Bell, Ltd., for Appellee Manny, Sterling Edwards Rives, III, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand, for Appellee Kaften.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Kendall v. Manny, C/A Nos. 85-806-N; 86-286-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 28, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status: Unpublished