U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1988

Nathan A. Thorne v. R.K. Bynum, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith

Nathan A. Thorne v. R.K. Bynum, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 1988
838 F.2d 1210; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1464 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Nathan A. Thorne v. R.K. Bynum, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith

Opinion

838 F.2d 1210
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathan A. THORNE, Plaintiff-Appellant.
v.
R.K. BYNUM, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7271.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 27, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 5, 1988.

Nathan A. Thorne, appellant pro se.

Nelson H.C. Fisher, Office of Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Thorne v. Bynum, C/A No. 86-570-N (E.D.Va. June 18, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.