Valentine v. Northington
Valentine v. Northington
Opinion
838 F.2d 1211
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arcelious VALENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harold NORTHINGTON, Sergeant, J.A. Crawford, Sergeant
Sergeant Rogers, Sergeant Ferguson; R. Staples, Sergeant,
J.W. Valentine, Sergeant, Lieutenant Starkes, W. Dugger,
Lieutenant, Officer Evans, Jane B. Watson, Officer, E.D.
Gillis, Officer, Officer Craft, D. Moseley, Officer, Officer
Clark, P.M. Gill, Officer, James M. Warren, James A. Smith,
Jr., Ellis B. Wright, Jr., and the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-6648.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 29, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 5, 1988.
Arcelious Valentine, appellant pro se.
Eric Karl Gould Fiske, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Valentine v. Northington, C/A No. 86-510-N (E.D.Va. Sept. 2, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.