Isaac Thomas Gray v. R v. Eisenberg, Detective, and the City of Virginia Beach, Karen Sue Powell
Isaac Thomas Gray v. R v. Eisenberg, Detective, and the City of Virginia Beach, Karen Sue Powell
Opinion
840 F.2d 10
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Isaac Thomas GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R.V. EISENBERG, Detective, Defendant-Appellee,
and
The City of Virginia Beach, Karen Sue Powell, Defendants.
No. 87-2144.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 30, 1987.
Decided Feb. 19, 1988.
Isaac Thomas Gray, appellant pro se.
William Everett Byman, City Attorney's Office, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Eisenberg, C/A No. 86-767-N (E.D.Va. June 17, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.