U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1988

E.Z. Bell v. Lt. Crumpler Officer Newsome Sgt. Vick Charles M. Creecy Sgt. Williams

E.Z. Bell v. Lt. Crumpler Officer Newsome Sgt. Vick Charles M. Creecy Sgt. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 1988
840 F.2d 10; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1648; 1988 WL 12245 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

E.Z. Bell v. Lt. Crumpler Officer Newsome Sgt. Vick Charles M. Creecy Sgt. Williams

Opinion

840 F.2d 10
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
E.Z. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lt. CRUMPLER; Officer Newsome; Sgt. Vick; Charles M.
Creecy; Sgt. Williams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-6632.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 18, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 10, 1988.

E.Z. Bell, appellant pro se.

Lucien Capone, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Crumpler, C/A No. 86-1054-CRT (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.