Zamber v. Rogers
Zamber v. Rogers
Opinion
843 F.2d 1389
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel W. ZAMBER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.P. ROGERS, Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections;
D.T. Mahon, Assistant Warden; J.C. Holloway,
Regional Ofc., Virginia Department of
Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7364.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 29, 1988.
Decided: April 7, 1988.
Daniel W. Zamber, Jr., appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm* the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Zamber v. Rogers, C/A No. 86-626-N (E.D.Va. Oct. 20, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Our affirmance is without prejudice to Zamber's right to file a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 seeking restoration of good-time credits, after he has exhausted state remedies
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.