Zolta A. Howie v. Charles M. Creecy, Attorney General of North Carolina
Zolta A. Howie v. Charles M. Creecy, Attorney General of North Carolina
Opinion
846 F.2d 71
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Zolta A. HOWIE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 87-7734.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 29, 1988.
Decided May 5, 1988.
Zolta A. Howie, appellant pro se.
Barry Steven McNeill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Howie v. Creecy, C/A No. 86-678-S (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1987).
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.