United States v. Dorothy Lee Parrish
United States v. Dorothy Lee Parrish
Opinion
846 F.2d 75
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dorothy Lee PARRISH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-7382.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 1988.
Decided April 29, 1988.
Dorothy Lee Parrish, appellant pro se.
N. George Metcalf, Assistant U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Parrish, CR-85-43-R (E.D.Va. Oct. 27, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.