U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1988

Haywood M. Hamm v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 1988

850 F.2d 689; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8465; 1988 WL 67857 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

850 F.2d 689
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Haywood M. HAMM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 88-6569.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 1988.
Decided: June 21, 1988.

Haywood M. Hamm, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Patricia Storch (Office of the Attorney General of Maryland), for appellee.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Haywood M. Hamm seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hamm v. Warden, C/A No. 87-94-Y (D.Md. Jan. 28, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.