Swisher v. Muncy
Swisher v. Muncy
Opinion
854 F.2d 1317
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard P. SWISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R.M. MUNCY, Warden, James E. Johnson, Assistant Warden,
Major Jack, and other unknown "John Doe"
defendants, in their individual and
official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7733.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 28, 1988.
Decided Aug. 4, 1988.
Richard P. Swisher, appellant pro se.
Alan Katz, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Swisher v. Muncy, CA-86-728-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 10, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.