David Allen Moore v. Talmadge Barnett
David Allen Moore v. Talmadge Barnett
Opinion
866 F.2d 1416
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Allen MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Talmadge BARNETT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 88-7295.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 1988.
Decided: Jan. 27, 1989.
David Allen Moore, appellant pro se.
Jacob L. Safron (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina), for appellee.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David A. Moore appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Barnett, C/A No. 88-85-CRT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, Oct. 6, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.