U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1989

United States v. Newby Franklin Love

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 21, 1989 · Widener, Ervin, Wilkinson

867 F.2d 209 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William Otis Kneece (Kneece, Kneece, Ashley, Gibbons & Kneece, on brief) for defendant-appellant., David Jarlath Slattery, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Vinton D. Lide, U.S. Atty., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Newby Franklin Love (4th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Newby Franklin Love has appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence 1 by the District Court of South Carolina. Although the two cases were not consolidated for purposes of appeal, Love’s oral argument was heard in this court at the same time as that of Robert Edward Lee, an original co-defendant, and the assignments of error pressed by Love and Lee are substantially identical.

After taking into consideration the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent authorities, we affirm the denial of Love’s motion for the reasons fully articulated in the opinion filed in the companion case of United States v. Lee, 867 F.2d 206 (4th Cir. 1989).

AFFIRMED.

. 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.