United States v. Richard H. Clinebell
United States v. Richard H. Clinebell
Opinion
877 F.2d 60
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard H. CLINEBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-7505.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 28, 1989.
Decided May 25, 1989.
Richard H. Clinebell, appellant pro se.
Charles T. Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Richard H. Clinebell appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States of America v. Clinebell, CR 86-77; C/A 88-1250 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 22, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.