Autry v. Richardson
Autry v. Richardson
Opinion
878 F.2d 378
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy Carness AUTRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sergeant RICHARDSON, Aaron Johnson, B.A. Hoffner, Gary T.
Dixon, Lieutenant Lamm, Sergeant Wilson, C.D. Hayslett, D.L.
Alford, Officer Hart, Officer Young, Officer McLaughlin,
D.R. Hayes, G. Williams, Central Prison Law Library,
Defendants-Appellees
No. 88-7808.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 28, 1989.
Decided June 27, 1989.
Timothy Carness Autry, appellant pro se.
Howard Edwin Hill, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Carness Autry appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Autry v. Richardson, C/A No. 88-232-CRT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.