U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1989

Jaime Traverso, Sr. v. Edward W. Murray, James M. Sisk, William P. Rogers, Thomas R. Israel, George Harden, Larry W. Jarvis

Jaime Traverso, Sr. v. Edward W. Murray, James M. Sisk, William P. Rogers, Thomas R. Israel, George Harden, Larry W. Jarvis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 14, 1989
883 F.2d 70; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11942; 1989 WL 90649 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Jaime Traverso, Sr. v. Edward W. Murray, James M. Sisk, William P. Rogers, Thomas R. Israel, George Harden, Larry W. Jarvis

Opinion

883 F.2d 70
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jaime TRAVERSO, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, James M. Sisk, William P. Rogers, Thomas
R. Israel, George Harden, Larry W. Jarvis,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6634.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 30, 1989.
Decided Aug. 14, 1989.

Jaime Traverso, Sr., appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellees.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jaime Traverso, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Traverso v. Murray, C/A No. 88-112-H (W.D.Va. Apr. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.