U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1989

James A. Newkirk v. Portsmouth Circuit Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1989

884 F.2d 1389; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12137; 1989 WL 100742 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

884 F.2d 1389
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James A. NEWKIRK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PORTSMOUTH CIRCUIT COURT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-6549.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1989.
Decided Aug. 16, 1989.

James A. Newkirk, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

James A. Newkirk appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Newkirk v. Portsmouth Circuit Court, C/A No. 88-1244-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.