U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1990

Fornell Cox v. Phil Ciesla

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 10, 1990

894 F.2d 401; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 242; 1990 WL 2288 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

894 F.2d 401
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Fornell COX, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Phil CIESLA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-6856.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 17, 1989.
Decided: Jan. 10, 1990.

Fornell Cox, appellant pro se.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Fornell Cox appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Ciesla, C/A No. 89-516-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.