U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1990

Lewis M. Scarborough v. Mike Norwood Randy E. Lee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 9, 1990

894 F.2d 402; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 192; 1990 WL 2301 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

894 F.2d 402
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lewis M. SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mike NORWOOD; Randy E. Lee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6861.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 1989.
Decided: Jan. 9, 1990.

Lewis M. Scarborough, appellant pro se.

Valerie Bateman, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Lewis M. Scarborough appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scarborough v. Norwood, CA-88-361-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 1989).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.