Lester Lee Brown v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney General
Lester Lee Brown v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney General
Opinion
900 F.2d 249
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lester Lee BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney
General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 89-7112.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 5, 1990.
Decided: March 21, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 88-720-WS)
Lester Lee Brown, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Lester Lee Brown seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Dixon, CA-88-720-WS (M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.