McKnight v. Gondles
McKnight v. Gondles
Opinion
900 F.2d 253
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Edwin MCKNIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James A. GONDLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellee,
and
ARLINGTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; Arlington County
Sheriff Department; Arlington County Sheriff Medical
Department; Arlington County Board of Supervisors; Steven
Kurylas; Marie Wells; Virginia State Board of Corrections,
Defendants.
No. 89-7060.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 5, 1990.
Decided March 20, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-85-R).
George Edwin McKnight, Jr., appellant pro se.
Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
George Edwin McKnight, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McKnight v. Gondles, C/A No. 88-85-R (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.