Roger Lee McKoy v. Anne Presley, Case Analyst Hazel W. Keith, Supervisor, Combined Records Lane Partin, Parole Case Analyst

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Roger Lee McKoy v. Anne Presley, Case Analyst Hazel W. Keith, Supervisor, Combined Records Lane Partin, Parole Case Analyst, 900 F.2d 253 (4th Cir. 1990)
20 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20572; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3784; 1990 WL 36697

Roger Lee McKoy v. Anne Presley, Case Analyst Hazel W. Keith, Supervisor, Combined Records Lane Partin, Parole Case Analyst

Opinion

900 F.2d 253
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger Lee MCKOY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anne PRESLEY, Case Analyst; Hazel W. Keith, Supervisor,
Combined Records; Lane Partin, Parole Case
Analyst, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6508.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 5, 1990.
Decided March 15, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-917-CRT-BO).

Roger Lee McKoy, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Roger Lee McKoy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McKoy v. Presley, C/A No. 89-917-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Status
Unpublished