Robert D. Haughie v. Carmina Hughes, Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney General of the State of Maryland Drake C. Zaharris, Attorney at Law
Robert D. Haughie v. Carmina Hughes, Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney General of the State of Maryland Drake C. Zaharris, Attorney at Law
Opinion
902 F.2d 28
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert D. HAUGHIE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carmina HUGHES, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Attorney General
of the State of Maryland; Drake C. Zaharris,
Attorney at Law, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6030.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 2, 1990.
Decided April 18, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (C/A 90-241-HM)
Robert D. Haughie, appellant pro se.
Carmina Szunyog Hughes, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md.; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert D. Haughie appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haughie v. Hughes, C/A No. 90-241-HM (D.Md. Jan. 24, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.