Kanzul Ali Kamal v. Raymond M. Muncy Toni v. Bair
Kanzul Ali Kamal v. Raymond M. Muncy Toni v. Bair
Opinion
904 F.2d 700
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kanzul Ali KAMAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Raymond M. MUNCY; Toni V. Bair, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6299.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 1990.
Decided: May 22, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-484-R).
Kanzul Ali Kamal, appellant pro se.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kanzul Ali Kamal appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.