Moses v. Cousins
Moses v. Cousins
Opinion
904 F.2d 700
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward Lee MOSES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gene T. COUSINS; Kenneth W. Harris; Homer M. Godfrey,
Captain; H.B. Byrd, Lieutenant; Kenneth E. Parker,
Lieutenant; William E. Crump, Sergeant; L.W. Morgan;
Ricky B. Jernigan, Officer; George L. Jones; Ben E. Mack;
Joe Baker; Frank M. Dickerson, Physician Assistant; Tony
E. Lewis, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Frank Snipes, Defendant.
No. 89-6895.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 1990.
Decided: May 22, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-462-CRT-H).
Edward Lee Moses, appellant pro se.
Howard Edwin Hill, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Lee Moses appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moses v. Cousins, C/A No. 88-462-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.