U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1990

United States v. James Elmer Ford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 1990

904 F.2d 701; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8434; 1990 WL 76567 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

904 F.2d 701
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Elmer FORD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-7178.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 26, 1990.
Decided: May 24, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (C/R No. 86-97-R; C/A 89-77-R).

James Elmer Ford, appellant pro se.

N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James Elmer Ford appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny the appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ford, CR-86-97-R; C/A 89-77-R (E.D.Va. June 26, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.