Coak M. Goldsmith v. Parker Evatt Department of South Carolina Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
Coak M. Goldsmith v. Parker Evatt Department of South Carolina Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
Opinion
905 F.2d 1529
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Coak M. GOLDSMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT; Department of South Carolina Probation,
Parole & Pardon Services, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 89-6403.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 9, 1990.
Decided May 8, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Clyde H. Hamilton, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-288)
Coak M. Goldsmith, appellant pro se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Coak M. Goldsmith seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion, the rationale of which parallels the reasoning of the magistrate's recommendation, discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Goldsmith v. Evatt, C/A No. 89-288 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.