U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1990

United States of America Maxcy Garrett, Revenue Officer v. Eric C. Stallings

United States of America Maxcy Garrett, Revenue Officer v. Eric C. Stallings
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 17, 1990
905 F.2d 1532; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8032; 1990 WL 74264 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States of America Maxcy Garrett, Revenue Officer v. Eric C. Stallings

Opinion

905 F.2d 1532
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America; Maxcy Garrett, Revenue Officer,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Eric C. STALLINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-1718.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 1990.
Decided May 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-125-7-CIV)

Eric C. Stallings, appellant pro se.

Richard Bruce Conely, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Eric C. Stallings appeals from the district court's order finding him in contempt of court. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stallings, C/A No. 89-125-7-CIV (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.