Cook v. Jordan
Cook v. Jordan
Opinion
908 F.2d 966
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Fred JORDAN, Division of Corrections; Richard Singleton,
Warden, Maryland House of Corrections; Security
Chief Thompson, Maryland House of
Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-7306.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 4, 1990.
Decided: June 20, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-2677).
William Cook, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Cook appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cook v. Jordan, CA-89-2677 (D.Md. Mar. 15, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.