Larry Bruce Bowling v. Wade D. Blankenship Mary Sue Terry
Larry Bruce Bowling v. Wade D. Blankenship Mary Sue Terry
Opinion
908 F.2d 966
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry Bruce BOWLING, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Wade D. BLANKENSHIP; Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-6520.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 4, 1990.
Decided: June 20, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-696-R).
Larry Bruce Bowling, appellant pro se.
Richard Alan Conway, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Bruce Bowling seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bowling v. Blankenship, C/A No. 88-696-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.