U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1990

James Bruce Robinson v. William E. Bobbitt, Jr., Raymond C. Robertson, Public Defender for the Commonwealth, Rudolph Bumgardner, Iii, Judge

James Bruce Robinson v. William E. Bobbitt, Jr., Raymond C. Robertson, Public Defender for the Commonwealth, Rudolph Bumgardner, Iii, Judge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 24, 1990
911 F.2d 724; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12296; 1990 WL 111460 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

James Bruce Robinson v. William E. Bobbitt, Jr., Raymond C. Robertson, Public Defender for the Commonwealth, Rudolph Bumgardner, Iii, Judge

Opinion

911 F.2d 724
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Bruce ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William E. BOBBITT, Jr., Raymond C. Robertson, Public
Defender for the Commonwealth, Rudolph Bumgardner,
III, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6575.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 9, 1990.
Decided July 24, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 90-1257-N)

James Bruce Robinson, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

James Bruce Robinson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Robinson's motion for counsel, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Bobbitt, C/A No. 90-1257-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.