Presley v. Young
Presley v. Young
Opinion
911 F.2d 724
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Donald Lee PRESLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
S.K. YOUNG, D.A. Garraghty, Paril Miller, J.P. Golden, R.A.
Young, L.B. Cei, Dan Lasner, R.A. Lipsner, R.D.
Anderson, Paul Elkins, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6829.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 19, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-718-R)
Donald Lee Presley, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Donald Lee Presley appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Presley v. Young, CA-89-718-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 12, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.