U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1990

Perry Lee Tolley v. Harry L. Allsbrook, Jr., Superintendent, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

Perry Lee Tolley v. Harry L. Allsbrook, Jr., Superintendent, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 1990
911 F.2d 725; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12258; 1990 WL 112032 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Perry Lee Tolley v. Harry L. Allsbrook, Jr., Superintendent, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

Opinion

911 F.2d 725
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Perry Lee TOLLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Harry L. ALLSBROOK, Jr., Superintendent, Attorney General of
the State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6585.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 89-371-C-G)

Perry Lee Tolley, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Perry Lee Tolley seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tolley v. Allsbrook, C/A No. 89-371-C-G (M.D.N.C. May 3, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.