Earl Acree v. C.R. Webb, Captain, F.L. Bogart, R.N., Robert Fry, M.D.
Earl Acree v. C.R. Webb, Captain, F.L. Bogart, R.N., Robert Fry, M.D.
Opinion
914 F.2d 1490
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earl ACREE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.R. WEBB, Captain, F.L. Bogart, R.N., Robert Fry, M.D.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6027.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 26, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-89-577-R)
Earl Acree, appellant pro se.
Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Edward Meade Macon, Mcguire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Earl Acree appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Acree v. Webb, CA-89-577-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 30, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished