Hackney v. Lester Trucking Co.
Hackney v. Lester Trucking Co.
Opinion
920 F.2d 926
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ethel HACKNEY, widow of James Hackney, Petitioner,
v.
LESTER TRUCKING COMPANY, Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 90-1508.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 17, 1990.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (88-3046-BLA)
Ethel Hackney, petitioner pro se.
Michael Francis Blair, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Va., Steven D. Breeskin, Deputy Commissioner, Donald Steven Shire, Associate Solicitor, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ethel Hackney seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hackney v. Lester Trucking Co., No. 88-3046-BLA (Ben.Rev.Bd. July 20, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ethel Hackney, Widow of James Hackney v. Lester Trucking Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
- Status
- Unpublished