Marie M. McMahon v. Patrick G. Henry, Iii, Richard L. Douglas, Claudia Bentley, David H. Savasten
Marie M. McMahon v. Patrick G. Henry, Iii, Richard L. Douglas, Claudia Bentley, David H. Savasten
Opinion
923 F.2d 848
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Marie M. McMAHON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patrick G. HENRY, III, Richard L. Douglas, Claudia Bentley,
David H. Savasten, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-1133.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 7, 1991.
Decided Jan. 25, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-24-M-K)
Marie M. McMahon, appellant pro se.
David Paul Cleek, Charleston, W.Va., Charles A. Kiser, Rodgers & Kiser, Martinsburg, W.Va., David H. Savasten, Berkeley Springs, W.Va., for appellees.
N.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Marie M. McMahon appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McMahon v. Henry, CA-90-24-M-K (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 27, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.