U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Woodson Frye v. C.R. Webb, Superintendent

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1991

924 F.2d 1051; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5195; 1991 WL 8481 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

924 F.2d 1051
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Woodson FRYE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.R. WEBB, Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-6188.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 7, 1991.
Decided Jan. 31, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-44-R)

Woodson Frye, appellant pro se.

William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Woodson Frye appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Frye v. Webb, CA-90-44-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.