U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Crowe v. Department of Corrections

Crowe v. Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1991
924 F.2d 1051; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5183; 1991 WL 8488 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Crowe v. Department of Corrections

Opinion

924 F.2d 1051
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leon Herbert CROWE, II,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMPLOYEES, Edward Murray,
Director, L.B. CEI, Manager, Toni V. Bair, Warden, Fred W.
Green, Assistant Warden, Jerry Davis, Record Custodian, P.
O'Halloran, J.R. Taylor, Chairman, I.C., H.B. Cassada, M.D.
Scales, G. Kiser, David A. Garraghty, Warden, Keith Davis,
Lt. Whitlow, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 7, 1991.
Decided Jan. 31, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge. (CA-89-138)

Leon Herbert Crowe, II, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Leon Herbert Crowe, II, appeals from the magistrate judge's* order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Crowe v. Dep't of Corrections, CA-89-138 (E.D.Va. May 8 and Nov. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.