U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Eugene R. Facon v. Sergeant Hines, Co Iii, Officer Trader, Co Ii, Officer Walls, Co Ii, Officer Collins, Co II

Eugene R. Facon v. Sergeant Hines, Co Iii, Officer Trader, Co Ii, Officer Walls, Co Ii, Officer Collins, Co II
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 1991
925 F.2d 1456; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 16542; 1991 WL 16500 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Eugene R. Facon v. Sergeant Hines, Co Iii, Officer Trader, Co Ii, Officer Walls, Co Ii, Officer Collins, Co II

Opinion

925 F.2d 1456
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eugene R. FACON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sergeant HINES, CO III, Officer Trader, CO II, Officer
Walls, CO II, Officer Collins, CO II, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6095.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 27, 1990.
Decided Feb. 14, 1991.

Eugene R. Facon, appellant pro se.

Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Eugene R. Facon appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Facon v. Hines, CA-89-2556-HAR (D.Md. June 7, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.