Ranson Allen v. C.D. Larsen
Ranson Allen v. C.D. Larsen
Opinion
925 F.2d 1456
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ranson ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.D. LARSEN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-6938.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
Decided Feb. 22, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-90-302-R)
Ranson Allen, appellant pro se.
Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ranson Allen appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Larsen, CA-90-302-R (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.