Torrey S. Mykjaaland v. Anthony Andrew Hickey
Torrey S. Mykjaaland v. Anthony Andrew Hickey
Opinion
925 F.2d 1457
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Torrey S. MYKJAALAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anthony Andrew HICKEY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-1128.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1990.
Decided Feb. 22, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Woodrow Wilson Jones, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-190-C-C)
Torrey S. Mykjaaland, appellant pro se.
Thomas J. Ziko, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Torrey S. Mykjaaland appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mykjaaland v. Hickey, CA-89-190-C-C (W.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.