U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

William Curtis Cannady v. Wilson County, Seventh District, State of North Carolina, Attorney General of North Carolina, Lacy H. Thornburg

William Curtis Cannady v. Wilson County, Seventh District, State of North Carolina, Attorney General of North Carolina, Lacy H. Thornburg
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 1991
927 F.2d 595; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8055; 1991 WL 22911 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

William Curtis Cannady v. Wilson County, Seventh District, State of North Carolina, Attorney General of North Carolina, Lacy H. Thornburg

Opinion

927 F.2d 595
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Curtis CANNADY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WILSON COUNTY, SEVENTH DISTRICT, State of North Carolina,
Attorney General of North Carolina, Lacy H.
Thornburg, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-7173.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
Decided Feb. 27, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-628)

William Curtis Cannady, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

William Curtis Cannady seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cannady v. Wilson County, CA-90-628 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.