U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Clinton Ivan McDaniel v. Peggy Rhine, Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary, and United States Postal Service

Clinton Ivan McDaniel v. Peggy Rhine, Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary, and United States Postal Service
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 1991
927 F.2d 596; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8091; 1991 WL 22921 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Clinton Ivan McDaniel v. Peggy Rhine, Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary, and United States Postal Service

Opinion

927 F.2d 596
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clinton Ivan McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Peggy RHINE, Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia
Penitentiary, Defendants-Appellees,
and
United States Postal Service, Defendant.

No. 90-6892.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
Decided Feb. 27, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Chief District Judge. (CA-83-167-E)

Clinton Ivan McDaniel, appellant pro se.

Dana Doyle Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, W.Va., for appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Clinton Ivan McDaniel appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDaniel v. Rhine, CA-83-167-E (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 7, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.