United States v. Terry Lee Hoosier
United States v. Terry Lee Hoosier
Opinion
927 F.2d 597
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Terry Lee Hoosier, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6894.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 15, 1991.
Decided March 7, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-158)
Terry Lee Hoosier, appellant pro se.
Nancy Carper Hill, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, W.Va., for appellee.
S.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. Hall, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Terry Lee Hoosier appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hoosier, CR-88-158 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 6, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.