U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Mark Lomar Johnson v. Larry W. Huffman, S. Conners, D. Swisher

Mark Lomar Johnson v. Larry W. Huffman, S. Conners, D. Swisher
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 1991
928 F.2d 399; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8669; 1991 WL 35006 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Mark Lomar Johnson v. Larry W. Huffman, S. Conners, D. Swisher

Opinion

928 F.2d 399
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mark Lomar JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry W. HUFFMAN, S. Conners, D. Swisher, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7166.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1991.
Decided March 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-88-605-R)

Mark Lamar Johnson, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Mark Lomar Johnson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Huffman, CA-88-605-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 29, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.