U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

United States v. Carl Allen Warmack

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 1991

928 F.2d 400; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8694; 1991 WL 35000 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

928 F.2d 400
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carl Allen WARMACK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6436.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 8, 1991.
Decided March 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CR-86-28; CA-89-715)

Carl Allen Warmack, appellant pro se.

E. Montgomery Tucker, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Va., for appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, CHAPMAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Allen Warmack appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Warmack, CR-86-28; CA-89-715 (W.D.Va. Nov. 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.